It just so happens that many video codecs are based on image formats, so ffmpeg already has a lot of the complex machinery to do so available to also implement these image formats - internally it can just handle it as a single frame of video with specialized formats for that.
Imagemagick (and other tools) also work, but why use multiple pieces of software if what you already have is adequate? ImageMagick is also software, and can also have vurnabilities.
Does nobody isolate ffmpeg and friends from their application?
I can’t imagine you’d have much fun breaking into a container that terminates the moment the original ffmpeg stops, or over-runs its max execution time…
Most are heap or stack overflows in parsers and demuxers, spanning components from the TS demuxer to the VP9 decoder. depthfirst says some already carry CVE identifiers; its writeup lists nine, CVE-2026-39210 through CVE-2026-39218, and notes the rest are fixed but not yet numbered. It also published a PoC.
Indeed. AI agents cannot “discover” zero days, they can only discover vulnerabilities. The humans can create zero days by reporting the vulnerability in the media without disclosing it properly.
What the fuck is a zero day in the context of ffmpeg?
Its not like its a system service that you can get ingress through…
“AI found 21 bugs in massive video project” sounds like junior developer shit hungry to get some shit on their resume.
Even if it wasn’t AI slop, this wouldn’t be impressive.
if you upload any image on lemmy, it goes through ffmpeg to be converted into a webp file.
now, you can feed arbitrary input to that ffmpeg process
I never thought of doing that with ffmpeg. Why ffmpeg, instead of imagmagick?
ffmpeg is on any system, has a consistent user interface for many different conversions
It just so happens that many video codecs are based on image formats, so ffmpeg already has a lot of the complex machinery to do so available to also implement these image formats - internally it can just handle it as a single frame of video with specialized formats for that.
Imagemagick (and other tools) also work, but why use multiple pieces of software if what you already have is adequate? ImageMagick is also software, and can also have vurnabilities.
Discovering bugs is not “AI slop”.
That term refers to something the AI made. This is just product testing, where a real human then fixes it as intended.
My understanding is that ffmpeg is the bedrock that all video streaming services use. I’m suspicious it’s a bigger deal than you think
With a competently crafted payload, you could perhaps get in via someone’s transcoding pipeline.
Does nobody isolate ffmpeg and friends from their application?
I can’t imagine you’d have much fun breaking into a container that terminates the moment the original ffmpeg stops, or over-runs its max execution time…
Container escapes do exist, and they have shared kernel with the host
From the article
Tell me you know nothing about the intricacies of media playback (especially hardware accelerated), without telling me…
FFMPEG in the command line generally has permission to access the entire non-sudo filesystem and delete files.
Yes but why are we allowing user input to be fed to an executable in that environment?
This is the environment that almost all user software is executed.
I imagine there are many web services around the world which use ffmpeg to handle user submitted content.
Indeed. AI agents cannot “discover” zero days, they can only discover vulnerabilities. The humans can create zero days by reporting the vulnerability in the media without disclosing it properly.