LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square759linkfedilinkarrow-up1818arrow-down180
arrow-up1738arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square759linkfedilink
minus-squareExtremeDullard@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70arrow-down3·1 month ago5 isn’t a valid function name, is obviously the right answer.
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 month agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·1 month agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·24 days ago so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)
minus-squaregnutrino@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 month agoIt could be a Church Numeral
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI’m pretty sure that’s a module operator…
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoDepends on the language.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·24 days ago Depends on the language No it doesn’t
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·24 days ago Yes it does Says person who can’t cite a single example of it depending on the language 🙄
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·24 days ago 5 isn’t a valid function name, is obviously the right answer. 5 is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5) is the correct answer
5 isn’t a valid function name, is obviously the right answer.
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)
It could be a Church Numeral
I’m pretty sure that’s a module operator…
Depends on the language.
No it doesn’t
Yes it does.
Says person who can’t cite a single example of it depending on the language 🙄
5 is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5) is the correct answer