• memfree@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not likely. Fetterman has two huge issues that pull him towards MAGA: a) tons of MAGA voters he must appease, and b) the stroke that messed up his brain.

      • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        tons of MAGA voters he must appease

        Dunno what current polling is like but Fetterman did not win with any support from MAGA. the right had a meltdown after his win was announced

        • CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Between Fetterman, Gabbard and Sinema, I think the DNC is intentionally pushing candidates like them knowing they’ll eventually flip. They’re laughing all the way to the bank while we argue over how to put them back in power. They have us right where they want us. It seems like the thing they do best, even more so than losing and governing ineffectively when they win, is the bait and switch.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hopefully this heralds the realignment of the Democrats back towards a pro-worker party. Neoliberalism has failed this country for 35 years.

    Quomo is a comically bad candidate and Mamdani is a very good one so I don’t think we can expect results like this in every primary. If progressives can keep finding highly qualified people I think we have a chance.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hopefully this heralds the realignment of the Democrats back towards a pro-worker party. Neoliberalism has failed this country for 35 years.

      Did you see how hard the democratic establishment worked against him? Nah.

      We need Bernie, AOC and some like minded folks to start a new party. Dems want to blame progressives for every loss? Fine. Give progressives a party full of established voices and known leaders. See how Dems do when NONE of the progressives give them a vote.

      And holy shit I just may have realized why 2020 made D track right instead of left. They know the non-monied class is slowly realizing what they stand for, and need to peel off R votes.

      • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Establishment Dems have been tracking right for decades. Clinton was a blue dog Democrat. Obama initially presented as more left, but ultimately didn’t govern that way.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The DNC needs to just finish the slow metamorphosis they’ve been going through for decades and finally merge with the RNC so we can get a new actual opposition party. It’s looking likely that that new party would end up being the democratic socialist party.

        • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sure, but how the hell was 2020 not a wake up call if representing the people actually mattered to them. I’m willing to give Clinton and to a lesser extent Obama some slack for being a product of their time. R hated Clinton then about as much as they do AOC now.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is why 62% of Democrats say they need new leaders. The neoliberals (and their billionaire backers) are afraid of losing power while the ground-level party is already shifting. I’m not convinced that splitting off the progressives will be productive in our current electoral system. By the time the Democrats die off the fascists will have abolished elections. Instead I envision an outcome similar to the political realignment the GOP just finished, where a growing progressive caucus gains enough traction in primaries to force concessions from the party leadership until the neoliberals are all but pushed out entirely.

        • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Instead I envision an outcome similar to the political realignment the GOP just finished, where a growing progressive caucus gains enough traction in primaries to force concessions from the party leadership until the neoliberals are all but pushed out entirely.

          I’d love for that to happen, but OP is literally the only crack I see.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m a DNC Strategist and I think the ONLY Reason people Voted for the Guy Promising to Help the Working Class is because Sexual Harasser Andrew Cuomo didn’t have ENOUGH Billionaires backing Him! Next time we’ll be SURE to get even MORE Billionaires like Elon Musk to Back our Candidates so their Message of “Fuck you” can REALLY Resonate with our Voters!

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I mean, yeah, that’s the problem that a lot of political commentary has right now, but Mamdani is explicitly a member of the DSA.

    • myrmidex@belgae.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      socialism

      noun

      so·​cial·​ism ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm

      any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

      Not anyone. Billionaires will not be helped by this.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yep, he is a Democratic Socialist which is actual socialism, unlike Social Democrats who are still capitalists.

        • TipRing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You may be confusing democratic socialism and social democracy. They are similar in their short-term goals, but democratic socialist have fundamental economic reform as their long-term goal, while social democrats just want to curtail the social problems of capitalism.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No true Scotsman nonsense. Different flavor of the same dessert. There is no pure “socialism,” it’s implemented differently in different places with different tags of all kinds.

          It’s socialism but with democratic processes/participation at its core. Economic theory is basically the same.

  • anachrohack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I predict that some of his policies will blow up in his face when they don’t work and then there will be a conservative backlash against democrats in the next election. Happened in SF