• Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I would love to hear what has you concerned about a tool which provides a piece of information which is, by law (California Penal Code Section 830.10), supposed to be accessible to all individuals interacting with the officer - their name and/or badge number.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The concern was the lack of knowledge that this was public. I noticed it’s in the article, I may have read over it

      • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even if an officer’s name and badge number were not public (which would be weird, because both of these are a part of a police officer’s uniform), what is the concern about a tool which provides these?

          • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You believe that a police officer, who is doing public actions, in a public role, should be given privacy while performing public actions? Say more