No. That’s stupid. Very, very stupid. How are races defined without specifying differences between races?
What makes something racist is unfounded critique of races, not simply references to races.
DISCLAIMER: I do not mean this in the context of OP’s digging at Indians. Without some heavy qualifications that go far beyond anecdote, it’s kinda’ a racist statement…
So if the critique is founded then its not racist? U can find a lot of statistics that are true and would get you called an extreme racist if u said em.
You seem to be completely forgetting that my point was that they should not be used to disparage an entire race, like pit bulls. You are on my side but you don’t even realize it…
No. That’s stupid. Very, very stupid. How are races defined without specifying differences between races?
What makes something racist is unfounded critique of races, not simply references to races.
DISCLAIMER: I do not mean this in the context of OP’s digging at Indians. Without some heavy qualifications that go far beyond anecdote, it’s kinda’ a racist statement…
So if the critique is founded then its not racist? U can find a lot of statistics that are true and would get you called an extreme racist if u said em.
For example is it racist to say that Arabs are more inbred? https://europepmc.org/article/MED/19811666
By your logic its also not racist to say that black people in america commit a disproportionate amount of crime https://crimeresearch.org/2023/11/violent-crime-rates-by-race/
These claims are founded in science and fact so therefore not racist right?
You seem to be completely forgetting that my point was that they should not be used to disparage an entire race, like pit bulls. You are on my side but you don’t even realize it…