• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    this isn’t incorrect. ULA is a fucking pork barrel of hideous proportions. doesn’t mean we shouldn’t nationalize spacex.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You don’t nationalise a company (SpaceX) just because the existing government owned company (NASA) is significantly worse. What do you think would happen to SpaceX if they did nationalise it? Lol. It would go to hell, like NASA.

      The government should not be responsible for things like this. The government should provide services for necessities for human rights and general standards of living, but they shouldn’t take over successful companies just because they couldn’t do it themselves.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We shot a space telescope half way to the sun and are observing the dawn of the entire universe.

        And you just wanna see a bigger penis rocket🌈

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sending something one way into space isn’t hard. Having it come back is. Having it, and all the parts that it took to get it there and back, be safely returned to earth and able to be reused is stupidly hard.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 hours ago

        NASA was pretty damn efficient with the budget they used to have.

        The wasteful NASA storyline is tiresome and busted.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And why do you think they have zero budget? The government lol. You think if the same government takes over SpaceX they’ll all of a sudden give them the huge budget that they need?

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You haven’t put your eggs in any basket. SpaceX are a private company. The government owns NASA, they can pour money into that and hire people to do what SpaceX are doing. Hell, they could poach people from SpaceX!

          Why do you think they haven’t already done this? Because the government don’t care about it. If someone else will do it they can use them to provide their services via ludicrously expensive contracts, and give them massive subsidies, as is the Government way.

          The government taking over SpaceX is not something anyone with even half a brain should be wanting. It makes ZERO sense. It doesn’t matter who owns it privately, just not the government because they will fuck it up and/or neglect it - like they did with NASA and most of their other projects.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You haven’t put your eggs in any basket.

            $38 billion in government funding. huh.

            what reality do you live in?

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s not putting eggs in a basket, that’s just wasteful government as always. The same government that you guys want to take control of SpaceX lol.