dwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agoPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square326fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down122
arrow-up1929arrow-down1external-linkPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comdwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square326fedilink
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·14 hours agoThis is 100% correct. You can downvote this person all you want but their not wrong! A painter doesn’t own anything to the estate of Rembrandt because they took inspiration from his paintings.
minus-squareSoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoSo if you take away all the copywrited training data then it makes the same images?
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·12 hours agoNo. And that’s the point…
minus-squareSoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoSo if it can’t function properly without other people’s work deciding what the art will look like that’s called copying. If human beings get shit for copying famous art or tracing we need to hold AI to the same standard.
This is 100% correct. You can downvote this person all you want but their not wrong!
A painter doesn’t own anything to the estate of Rembrandt because they took inspiration from his paintings.
So if you take away all the copywrited training data then it makes the same images?
No. And that’s the point…
So if it can’t function properly without other people’s work deciding what the art will look like that’s called copying.
If human beings get shit for copying famous art or tracing we need to hold AI to the same standard.