“Corporations are people, my friend,” Mitt Romney famously said in 2011 while running for president. The Supreme Court decided the previous year that corporations could give money to political campaigns, just like people, and in 2014, the high court gave corporations religious freedom to deny contraceptives to employees, thereby letting them behave just as badly as people. If you prick corporations, do they not bleed?
Actually no, they don’t. But as of now, they can get presidential pardons.
The notion that corporations are people did not originate with the Supreme Court’s notorious Citizens United decision in 2010. Way back in 1886, the high court ruled in Santa Clara County v. Union Pacific Railroad that corporations were covered by the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. To be more precise, this question was addressed not in the decision (which resolved a local taxation dispute) but rather in a headnote that said the court “does not wish to hear argument on the question” of whether the Fourteenth Amendment applies to corporations because “we are all of the opinion that it does.“ Somehow this non sequitur became legal precedent. “Later cases,” wrote Stetson University law professor Clara Torres-Spelliscy in a 2014 analysis for the nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice, “uncritically cited the headnote as if it had been part of the case.”
You know what isn’t declining? Pardons for corporations. Trump has granted nine. These were never a thing before Trump—not in the modern era, and possibly never. According to Bloomberg’s Ava Benny-Morrison, the nine pardons wiped out $200 million in financial penalties, “some of which were destined for victims of wrongdoing.” Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, told Bloomberg: “In any previous era no president would touch this with a barge pole. Maybe individual cases with some compelling reason, but the systemic elimination of criminal liability of major financial crime would never have happened before, and it didn’t.”
Half of the $200 million in wiped-out fines can be attributed to a single crypto company, BitMEX. The three co-founders of the company, a pioneer in crypto derivatives, all pleaded guilty in 2022 to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires maintaining certain safeguards against money laundering. Each paid $10 million in fines. Then, in July 2024, BitMEX itself pleaded guilty to the same crime, and this past January the company was fined $100 million.
The widespread lead poisoning we experience is not from antiquity. It is from air pollution. Leaded gas was only recently phased out completely. We will be dealing with this for several hundred years.
It doesn’t matter who invented a technology, it mattered who proliferated it. Also, the smoking gun was real. US scientists were responsible for the petro chemical revolution and this technology was brought to the rest of the world. They had misgivings at the time it was not safe for human exposure and later confirmed it with their own studies.
While the concept of plastic may be traced back to other countries, the commercialization is not. Bakelite, the first mass produced plastic, was invented and manufactured in the US.
Just like global warming, they always knew it was a problem and ignored it and later lied and created massive propaganda to counteract public opinion. This can be seen clearly with recycling and plastic. They created an impossible burden on the consumer in order to shift the blame for the pollution they created. This is rather common across different industries think big tobacco, pharmaceuticals, and our US food manufacturers.
How much agent Orange was dropped by the British? Also, I don’t believe you are correct with who invented it even.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Galston
The US has had its hand in destabilizing the countries that have modern slavery and has taken advantage through the markets to make profits from human slavery not to mention engaging in forced labor themselves. This is also ignoring other flavors of modern slavery like wage slavery. The US abolishment of slavery was more about economic considerations than morality, so I think your entire premise may be off a bit. Simply put, it was cheaper to have sharecroppers than slaves. Slavery was outlawed in name only but never the spirit of it.
Europe banned the slave trade decades before the US. Unless you are talking some specific example and then you may have a point. That point is quickly lost when you see the institutionalized racism that exists in all of the US and is currently being denied by the US government while instituting more systemic racism everyday.
At any rate, I get it. Your obsessed with the concept of liberty but ignore that the US uses it as lip service to dominate and poison the world. I have only touched on a fraction of what I know the US has done. I have researched this for decades now and I am always learning awful new truths. I also know I am no expert because the more I learn the more I realize I don’t know. Any one of the topics I have brought up would take a lifetime to truly approach mastery of.
I also have detailed explanations of why it isn’t so bad to live in the US despite living under a fascist oligarchy. I totally get your denialism. It is literally baked into the very being of the US and started all the way back in the American Revolution.
I know you are not trying to come off as an apologist, but yet we are here. This is why I don’t carry water for nations and instead look to a better future that is not chained by the myopic rulers we have now.
The lead poisoning rate has actually dropped off:
The US lead poisoning rate is actually pretty decent when compared to the rest of the world:
It does, and it doesn’t. The EPA finished phasing out leaded gasoline in 1996. It started in 1973.
True, but that isn’t a sin inherent to the United States. That is a sin belonging to all of humanity, and there are numerous cases of such things being done related to other hazards over the course of human history. I’m not trying to excuse the US’s industrial sciences, but I am trying to put it into perspective. Also, the corporate responsibility does not weigh on all of America. The US is not the gasoline industry alone.
Yes, but the US generally keeps from perpetuating its impact on plastic pollution, unlike much of the rest of the world (including other industrialized countries).
As I mentioned, the US took a hard right with respect to climate change recently. but it is not the leader in CO2 emissions, and it is not the only developed nation with an undue per capita emission of CO2. Further, its C02 emissions has been dropping for the last ~30 years.
As a means of tactical warfare, Agent Orange was originally utilized by Britain during the Malayan Emergency of the 1950s. Britain used Agent Orange to defoliate the trees that could provide possible cover for insurgents as well as to destroy food crops.. In fact, the British were the first to use Agent Orange as a defoliant in South Asia. Under your logic of “the first to invent the process are the ones who bear all the blame” (which you have pointed to numerous times), the British would then be responsible for all of Agent Orange’s use is South East Asia.
It was the Cold War. The USSR also has effected such changes. In fact, the Russians are attempting to do that right at this very moment.
Oh, so an exchange of value of wages is given? The value of labor is inherently bargained for. It is fundamental to contract law. The 13th Amendment inherently bans explicit slavery when it is not a punishment for a crime. What constitutes a crime is up to the legislative process for enacting a statute. Criminal law is expressly stated in Title 18 of the US Code. So, its not like ignorance would be an excuse, and the nature of labor as punishment for a crime =/= the colonial slave trade propegated by Europe.
Actually, it was done through the Emancipation Proclamation, where Lincoln specifically said “I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free”. Admittedly, it was done because it was a necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, but the 13th Amendment kept that from coming back.
Maybe, but Europe was well ready to continue benefiting from slavery, but Europe was discovered colluding with the Confederacy during the Trent Affair. Also, the UK had only banned slavery 30 years prior to the US, and France did so only during the French Revolution which was from 1789 to 1799. Hard to bash the US for being slower to do so when it was more or less within the lifetime of the revolutionary war’s fighters’ grandchildren.
It is not lip service. All Americans are obsessed with the concept of liberty. If fact, the document that dissolved the US’s bond with the UK even mentions liberty in saying “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”.
My point is that its human nature to do so, not an original sin from the US only. No nation is free from sin, but the US’s history as generally swung towards supporting liberty.
It is well admitted the US has done bad things. But, the US did and does a ton of good things to support the world’s well-being too. Hell, the US basically propped up the UK in fighting the Nazis with tits supply convoys.
Clearly . . .
Keep learning.
Thanks for knowing and explaining my point/intent to me. Its always helpful to have someone explain that to me. Now that you’ve explained it, I now know my point wasn’t that it isn’t a nuanced topic.
That we both can agree on.
There are millions of people dying every year from lead poisoning. Not to mention the lead that was spread by air pollution doesn’t magically disappear. Perhaps this is what you mean by dropped off as in the environment is totally poisoned but we are poisoning it less in the US nowadays. I wonder if the millions of people affected would agree with you… Oh yeah, they can’t because they are dead.
Your hand waving of the US development and proliferation of the petro chemical revolution is almost comical. It is the whole world’s fault! Sounds like exactly what US executives would say to absolve themselves of responsibility. No surprise here as you are ever the apologist. That is okay, I will criticize and you can apologize.
Knowing the US has off-shored much of its polluting industries is just another example of the complexity of this situation honestly. Sometimes it feels like this is a discussion with someone who has a couple pieces of the puzzle and then having them tell you what the whole puzzle looks like.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199625000029
As for Agent Orange with the British.
“The British applied a precursor formula that was in many ways identical to Agent Orange called Trioxone. It was mainly used along specific roadways and crop areas using trucks, ground sprayers, and occasional small-scale helicopter runs rather than sweeping mass aerial campaigns. Exact totals are poorly documented, but the volume was infinitesimally small compared to the millions of gallons dropped in Southeast Asia.”
I also find your original sin argument misplaced. I keep mentioning the proliferation for a reason. Inventing it and proliferating it is definitely the sin though.
The fact that the US toppled tons of countries and killed millions of leftists is okay because “cold war” is some next level hand waving that yet again manages to surprise me. I suppose US sponsored torture was also okay because “terrorism” by your tortured logic. Or perhaps I may be micharacterizing your stance, but then you also display copious levels of US propaganda unironically which makes me doubt this stance is simply a statement rather than a judgement.
You seem to deny wage slavery and other common criticism of capitalism because, “they are bargained for”. So you don’t have any argument other than it is just the way it is I guess. Why not take it from a mythological founding father who owned slaves and considered all men equal. The one that thought earning a wage made you dependent on your employer and ruined free elections. Strange, but wasn’t there just a shit ton of bosses threatening their workers that they need to vote for Trump or else!?
Later on you claim that everyone pollutes the fuck and dominates the planet because it is just human nature. Another round of apology for the crowd I guess. This is a consistent theme in your responses that is not really nuanced as you claim. Perhaps I am reading too much in, but I am getting a sinking feeling I am not.
Actually, Lincoln did not really free the slaves in any real sense. As I mentioned, share cropping was simply cheaper than regular slavery, often times more brutal, and most importantly was just slavery in another name. Lincoln himself did not even believe blacks were equal with whites until the end of his career.
Which segways nicely into your bullshit about liberty. There is a reason much of the world hates and criticizes liberals. As Lincoln himself demonstrated liberty equates to almost 200 years of free agency for racism. On a side note, for every bullshit founding fatherism and other pieces of US propaganda you crap out know there are many examples of why they stink so bad.
I find the part about the US supplying British against the Nazi as ignoring reality so hard it hurts. It was US industrialists that helped rebuild Germany after WWI. It was US companies that gave material support to the Nazi like IBM providing the computing power and logistics used in the final solution which was, of course, based off the genocide of the Native Americans.
This is how ignorant you act. You are going to praise the US that inspired and had its hands in the Holocaust because… they helped both sides!? Excuse me while I go throw up.
Please tell me how I need to read some more, you sure act like a funny person don’t you. You can’t see the future because you can’t even objectively see what has or is happening.
I am glad we can both agree you are an apologist err I mean a person with a nuanced perspective. Setting cynicism aside, we both want a better future which is admirable. I do appreciate your position on this.