After the Panama Papers and similar leaks, people are ready to believe some kind of anonymous hacker collective is still out there investigating and releasing information. So they’ll jump on the headline, because it resonates with their memories of historical incidents. They won’t interrogate it, because they’re not in the position to sift fact from fiction.
This is one of the problems with Upvote-based news aggregators to begin with. You’re asking people to make evaluations of an article’s interest at the headline level, rather than relying on editors and ombudsmen to sift out what information is both credible and interesting to a wide audience.
How is this obvious AI slop getting upvoted so much?
After the Panama Papers and similar leaks, people are ready to believe some kind of anonymous hacker collective is still out there investigating and releasing information. So they’ll jump on the headline, because it resonates with their memories of historical incidents. They won’t interrogate it, because they’re not in the position to sift fact from fiction.
This is one of the problems with Upvote-based news aggregators to begin with. You’re asking people to make evaluations of an article’s interest at the headline level, rather than relying on editors and ombudsmen to sift out what information is both credible and interesting to a wide audience.