• Footer1998@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hate these studies. They’re always just based on correlations, and ignores the elephant in the room: class. How wealthy you are, how wealthy the area you live in, those factors have the highest impact on health outcomes, but the mainstream media (which is owned by the ruling class) will never be honest about that. So they just find correlations that let them blame poor people for having shitty diets.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Where do you have that data to show this. I know there’s studies clearly showing wealth and cancer rates but do you have data showing it in relation to weight.

  • hcf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    None 👏 of this 👏 shit matters 👏 if food 👏is unaffordable👏 and healthcare 👏 bankrupts your 👏 household.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eating less 👏 always costs 👏 less than 👏 eating more.

      Does this make the point more clearly? I think it looks pretty dumb, but you do you.

      The organic food industry has done great damage to Western society by making people think you need to buy fresh organic food to eat healthy, when canned/jarred/frozen conventional food is absolutely fine as well, for a fraction of the cost.

      Yes, you will need to spend some time preparing it, unlike fastfood. But it’s MUCH cheaper, less calorie dense and contains more micronutrients.