Tea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoWorld’s smallest LEDs from a new semiconductor: New LED displays packing 90nm 'virus-sized' pixels can deliver 127,000 PPI visuals.www.zju.edu.cnexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1130arrow-down11
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-linkWorld’s smallest LEDs from a new semiconductor: New LED displays packing 90nm 'virus-sized' pixels can deliver 127,000 PPI visuals.www.zju.edu.cnTea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareLandless2029@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours ago127000 PPI e-ink display. Allows transparency. Needs some kind of extremely tiny body heart driven power source, WiFi chip and processor… Closer and closer to cyberpunk era tech (and oppression)
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-22 days agoVery creative, maybe some day. But I think it will require serious developments in other areas too. Like technologies we don’t even have yet.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agowe already have tiny flexible screens and the means to beam video data to it wirelessly. we also have microscopic chip litography to handle it.
minus-squareSeekPie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoBut no small or translucent batteries
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 hours agothe obvious solution to this problem is running a convenient wire from your eyeball 🤪
minus-squaremonarch@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agodon’t necessarily need one if they are power efficent enough.
minus-squareSeekPie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoHow would you power them without a battery? It doesn’t matter if it’s really power efficient if it isn’t getting any power.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoyou can beam tiny amounts of it ota. it just needs to be very power efficient.
minus-squaremonarch@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoWirelessly. Like an NFC tag. Not saying it would be super practical but if you custom shaped them you could put a wire coil around all of the non seeing parts of the eye.
minus-squaredzsimbo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·22 hours agoJust make it sodium based, and a good crying jag will replenish the battery.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoim not saying it wouldnt be a challenge, but isnt solar panel tech possible here? it just has to be really power efficient.
Contact lenses?
127000 PPI e-ink display. Allows transparency.
Needs some kind of extremely tiny body heart driven power source, WiFi chip and processor…
Closer and closer to cyberpunk era tech (and oppression)
Very creative, maybe some day. But I think it will require serious developments in other areas too. Like technologies we don’t even have yet.
we already have tiny flexible screens and the means to beam video data to it wirelessly. we also have microscopic chip litography to handle it.
But no small or translucent batteries
the obvious solution to this problem is running a convenient wire from your eyeball 🤪
don’t necessarily need one if they are power efficent enough.
How would you power them without a battery? It doesn’t matter if it’s really power efficient if it isn’t getting any power.
you can beam tiny amounts of it ota. it just needs to be very power efficient.
Wirelessly. Like an NFC tag.
Not saying it would be super practical but if you custom shaped them you could put a wire coil around all of the non seeing parts of the eye.
Just make it sodium based, and a good crying jag will replenish the battery.
im not saying it wouldnt be a challenge, but isnt solar panel tech possible here?
it just has to be really power efficient.