• Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tax companies revenue first. It would be at a lower rate then profit but also doesn’t allow them to hide the profit.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I never said anything about income tax… But again, these are real things that we used to have and they have elsewhere:

      Tax brackets to to 90%+ on business profits - incentivize companies to reinvest in r&d while disincentiving investment

      Tax inheritance and crack down on forever trusts

      Progressively tax money moving in and out of the country, and close up tax loopholes (killing the tax filing industry would be a necessary prerequisite)

      You could even revamp capital gains and certain types of loan to somehow figure into a progressive income tax

      And most importantly - this has been done before. It has been done, you can pick apart suggested methods and come up with excuses for why it’s impossible… But it’s so clearly not. Everything else is an engineering problem

      If you want to hear economists talk about it, Garys economics on YouTube popped into my feed a few days ago. He’s far from the only one, even Warren Buffett has gone through a plan where he says the full tax burden could be put on businesses

      And if you want to know why I don’t respect economics… It’s not because I’m not read up on it, it’s because: how can you read up on it and still think taxing the wealthy is impossible? This has been written about by economists for decades, but it doesn’t matter because there’s more convenient economic theories to push far and wide

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          And there we go… I must not know anything about economics because you’ve been fed convenient models that justify the decision to cut taxes, and I’m not quoting them back to you

          And FYI, I even added a side note about this - want to know some tax avoidance strategies that I like? R&D. Higher wages and benefits to compete over talent. Fancy offices and better equipment. Swag and giveaways to capture customer loyalty

          This is why fuck “fuck economics”. I tell you it worked, we had a less inequal society, and you come back with “well, cutting this raised tax revenues”.

          Of course it did - it let the wealthy open up a spigot from companies to their portfolios, and the government gets a portion.

          It incentivized slashing corporate spending, but corporate spending is good - it’s money flowing back into the economy. Even if they keep it in a slush fund, at least that fund will offset loans needed to expand or weather a storm - loans that also funnel money upwards and essentially force companies to pay a tax to the rich to continue to exist

          But please, keep dismissing everything I say as “they just don’t understand economics”. No, I understand it well enough to know that what I was being taught didn’t add up