What’s so cancer about it?

Who just found that out?

Thanks, I’ll check out what they did later.

Which game is that, if you don’t mind me asking?

Nah, it’s something you’re lucky enough to learn coincidentally or you don’t. And if you found out too late in life, you might be too stubborn to learn it at that point.

I also thought it was intentional, and hilarious, but this one is definitely an improvement.

The Pixel 4 has a Snapdragon 855 which does have a neural engine, which is similar to the AI engine used in AI laptops, so you’re just completely wrong there.

Windows does advertise this feature, though. It’s the only thing that would make me even want an AI laptop.

I want video live caption, so that’s one reason.

That’s not how it works, the meme is only pointing out the irony, not saying the Taliban is not allowed to fight back against the Islamic State.

You seem to have some trouble differentiating between making fun the Taliban vs defending the enemy of them. If I make fun of the US, that doesn’t mean I am defending China or Russia. Somehow, your head have managed to mix these two things together.

Can I chalk this up to you strongly supporting the Taliban to the point that any slight against them means it is defending their enemy?

Again, I’m asking where he defended the Islamic State like you claimed. Making fun of the Taliban is not defending their enemies.

Can you show me where they defended the Islamic State?

Oh yeah, they did mention that clause. I guess you can still limit the power of the wireless router so it doesn’t penetrate too far outside the rooms, as well as using bands that is not as congrsted. That might be good enough to comply to the TOS, or it might not.

That might be one of the concern, but the TOS clearly doesn’t state that. They only prohibit against attaching multiple devices to the network. If you attach it to your desktop PC, it could be considered not on the network as long as you don’t bridge the two connections together.

An extra step that doesn’t go against their TOS, though.

By your logic, light isn’t a useful sense to possess since it’s everywhere all the time thanks to sunlight and moonlight, is that correct?

Actually, since ultraviolet radiation and light are both electromagnetic waves, they should be treated the same, shouldn’t they? It’s as if there could be a different reason why we can detect one but not the other.

What is this, minecraft?

You might be right, I’ve misread the point of the parent comment in the first place. I guess I just wasted both of our time, sorry about that.

Why do we need to differentiate those two use cases, anyway? It’s not like they differentiate between a single human or multiple humans consuming the content, or if there are non-humans also consuming it. Differentiating those two use cases is just another example of publishers wanting more money due to greed. I’m not sure why Lemmy is so supportive of that.

Both humans and AI consume the content, even if they do not do so in the exact same way. I don’t see the need to differentiate that. It’s not like we have any idea of the mechanism by which humans consume a content to make the differentiation in the first place.