You can’t spell chemtrails without Epstein, maybe?

Just 100%'d Caravan Sandwitch and I have a few hours in Outbound. It’s definitely not a crafty/survival type of game like outbound. Slightly metroidvania with how you unlock abilities through the game and there’s the slightest bit of backtracking to use them. Caravan is more or less a comfy story game without most of the trappings of modern open world games.

LLM AI is just like a Google search 🤡

Adguard still hasn’t fixed TV YouTube ads for me. They inject through a different kind of protocol from what I understand. If you can get Smart Tube on your TV through sideloading (I used Jdownloader on android TV) it will be ad free

I’ve loved my Flint 2. Being powerful enough to run my VPN and a pretty stout adguard home setup has been huge.

The problem is that science cannot prove a negative. They can only produce evidence that, to the best of their knowledge, it appears that people weren’t flying, but there will always be additional questions at every level. Soon enough the research will run out of answers.

I.E. “Well, do you have records of every region of Malaysia during that time? What about every family? Maybe it was passed down in just one lineage. Can you show me the evidence you collected on every single Malay? Maybe it was just one person.”

When dealing with people making obscene claims, the only sensible way forward is to require them to produce evidence of their claims or get off the proverbial stage.

If she was exercising any level of critical thinking she would realize how insane her ideas are.

Google cannot install apps in Graphene without explicit, app by app permission (due to the sandboxes Google play). We are safe

You could just admit that you learned something new and leave it at that. No need to be a dick.

You’re not wrong! Life is a nightmare. It’s really sad that my metric nowadays for right and wrong is mostly whether or not the business is actively spying on me to find out how many pennies they can squeeze out of me.

IF the testing was purely random assignment of price points to gauge the markets ability to support a higher price, I think that is capitalism operating normally.

Now, on the other side, if the pricing changes were based on using the customers own data and spending habits to determine what a specific customer could be squeezed for, it is unacceptable and should be boycotted.

Are you arguing that this is fine, or acceptable?

Tunic!!!

I’ll take your word on it, thanks!

https://static.klipy.com/ii/4e7bea9f7a3371424e6c16ebc93252fe/40/6b/9LtEFtXkLNlPx.gif

Segas been killing it recently, no hate from me