• MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    A man was sexually assaulted in jail

    This kind of shit has to stop. The jailers must help held accountable. I understand this is difficult due to bad laws, but the laws need to change.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Faulty software and people who don’t operate it properly, this is going to cause a lot of problems in the coming years. I read another article about faulty Fujitsu auditing software in the UK that led to 400 postmasters being falsely accused of theft.

    • Cowlitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That shit was wild. It went on for so long and impacted so many people. At that point I have to think people were intentionally ignoring it. It ruined so many lives just to say “haha sorry, was a software glitch” when they could have investigated it at any point and definitely should have with the strange uptick in “embezzlement”.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was investigated. They opened an internal investigation and when it became obvious the investigator was going to blow it open, they cancelled the investigation 2 days before the report was going to come out.

        Seriously, it’s really looking like the entire board over several years should face jail time.

  • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is this not a case of an unavailable accusers? In other words, Traffic Cams have time and again been overturned as unconstitutional because you have the right to face your accusers?

    Pretty sure Tom from IT can rustle up a laptop to take to court but…Facial Recog. is some bullshit 1984 bullshit.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t want to shop in stores that scan my face 🙊 time for some research.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wild that you can base a whole case on what a photo AI thinks it is seeing. These programs at the very least should work like DNA or fingerprint matching and provide a percentage of its accuracy, not just that it finds some kinda close image in its database and everyone rolls with it. And it should need some other piece of evidence as well to back it up, it should never be the “best” part of a prosecutors case.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is why traffic cams in the US have had issues for years, and most of them are run privately, and issue “civil fines”.

      Because “civil fines” (taxes, under another name, same as “civil fees”) don’t have the legal issues of receiving a ticket.

      Tickets generally require interaction with an officer. Since cameras and their companies aren’t officers, they can’t generate a ticket/summons. So the gov end-runs this by using civil fees/fines, with the camera operators receiving upward of 85% of the fee.

      And being a fee/fine, it’s difficult to get out of, even if you’re innocent and pursue it in court.

      Of course, every jurisdiction is different, so it depends on the local legal structure.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      With most digital forensic tools thats exactly what they do. There’s a specific threshold that gives a match probability. It’s designed as a way to point someone in a direction, not to confirm identity.

      I can totally see cops using this as probable cause but it would get totally laughed out of a courtroom.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can totally see cops using this as probable cause but it would get totally laughed out of a courtroom.

        Should, not would. Get a backwards ass judge and it’ll fly. Your life is already fucked by the time you appeal it.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That dude deserves a payday at the very least. Facial recognition isn’t reliable yet. And even when it is that shit should still be illegal to use as the sole justification in arrests. Do some god damn police work. Especially if the dude has an air tight alibi like BEING IN JAIL. It would take 5 minutes to confirm that.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are we all gonna have to start wearing disruptive clothing to avoid our lives being destroyed by an algo with immunity?